10: How was the multiverse/universe created?
Scientist can now basically backtrack the creation of the universe through mathematics. We know how fast light travels; it takes about 8 min for light to travel from the sun to the earth. So, if the sun were to go out all of the sudden, we wouldn’t see that it had for 8min. That’s the reason why we use the unit light-year for distance. If something is one light-year away, it would take one year for a beam of light travel from it to the observer. This also means that if we look at something that is one light-year away, we are seeing events that took place one year prior. The next part of the puzzle is to understand the current expansion of this universe, which we do. Reversing the pattern of its expansion, gives us a fairly accurate reading of its origin, about 15 billion years ago.
I call this the universe, the place where we exist right now. Do other universes exist? I don’t know the answer to that off hand but I do know that it is fair to assume that they do. Therefore, I use the term multiverse to include all things in existence. In this way I don’t create a separation. Using the term universe means that any thing I think philosophically would need to be updated if I later want to include a new universe in my theory. Using multiverse let’s me create a ‘bucket’ for more universes in the future.
After all that I’m going to write about our universe specifically. Using the creation of this universe as a model, I can come up with a basis for the creation of other universes. Anyway, we know through science that our universe originated at one specific point. Outside of that point is a vacuum. A vacuum is considered a volume of space that contains no matter. Scientist, to this day contemplate whether or not a ‘true’ vacuum exists in nature, or if it’s only approached. Well, that is pretty much the ‘end’ of the big-bang theory. Scientist have only scattered theories on how or why our universe began to expand.
That’s the general disconnect between science and reality. Science has a problem quantifying consciousness. Consciousness is what’s missing from the big-bang theory. The same way that science has looked at the expansion of the ‘physical’ universe and back-tracked, we can look at the expansion of consciousness and back-track.
We are all the children of god, and as god’s children created in its image, we share characteristics. Not to mention that we are not fully separate from god. When we look at our nature we can see god’s nature. Our nature is one of question. The nature of the multverse is one of change. The only way to allow for constant change is to ask a question that cannot be answered. (otherwise, at some point in time the universe will stop existing) I believe that that question is what we all want to know; what am I? The universe is a real-time answer to this question. God asked that question at the beginning of our time in this universe.
In order for god to define itself, it needed to define what was outside of self. To define energy/matter there needed to be the absence of matter or the existence of vacuum. Energy and matter exist on a spectrum of electro-magnetic vibration through time. Well, that sets up the bases for god’s defining its physical existence. To set up the answer to what god is in terms of consciousness, requires and outside perspective. So god is the universe but what is the universe? The universe IS what it is perceived to be. In order to get a unique ‘outside’ perspective, god had to create something that has an individual consciousness. To create an evolved equal for the comparison would be like creating a robot, and that robot would have the same perspective as its creator. That wouldn’t work. Instead god created a means of a self-creating universe that evolves consciousness through time. So as these consciousnesses evolve, they come closer to an answer of what god is and what they are. Since each consciousness is individual and is changing, there will never be an absolute answer.
Ultimately, there is no separation between the question and the answer. In other words, we are what we do. We must BE ourselves. We express ourselves in every action that we take. Our action is based on our individual perspective of the universe. We are living the answer to the question. God witnesses itself through our eyes, so every one of us is important, regardless of the total number. Our goal as a group should be to allow us all to explore and express our individuality to the limits of our existence.
I call this the universe, the place where we exist right now. Do other universes exist? I don’t know the answer to that off hand but I do know that it is fair to assume that they do. Therefore, I use the term multiverse to include all things in existence. In this way I don’t create a separation. Using the term universe means that any thing I think philosophically would need to be updated if I later want to include a new universe in my theory. Using multiverse let’s me create a ‘bucket’ for more universes in the future.
After all that I’m going to write about our universe specifically. Using the creation of this universe as a model, I can come up with a basis for the creation of other universes. Anyway, we know through science that our universe originated at one specific point. Outside of that point is a vacuum. A vacuum is considered a volume of space that contains no matter. Scientist, to this day contemplate whether or not a ‘true’ vacuum exists in nature, or if it’s only approached. Well, that is pretty much the ‘end’ of the big-bang theory. Scientist have only scattered theories on how or why our universe began to expand.
That’s the general disconnect between science and reality. Science has a problem quantifying consciousness. Consciousness is what’s missing from the big-bang theory. The same way that science has looked at the expansion of the ‘physical’ universe and back-tracked, we can look at the expansion of consciousness and back-track.
We are all the children of god, and as god’s children created in its image, we share characteristics. Not to mention that we are not fully separate from god. When we look at our nature we can see god’s nature. Our nature is one of question. The nature of the multverse is one of change. The only way to allow for constant change is to ask a question that cannot be answered. (otherwise, at some point in time the universe will stop existing) I believe that that question is what we all want to know; what am I? The universe is a real-time answer to this question. God asked that question at the beginning of our time in this universe.
In order for god to define itself, it needed to define what was outside of self. To define energy/matter there needed to be the absence of matter or the existence of vacuum. Energy and matter exist on a spectrum of electro-magnetic vibration through time. Well, that sets up the bases for god’s defining its physical existence. To set up the answer to what god is in terms of consciousness, requires and outside perspective. So god is the universe but what is the universe? The universe IS what it is perceived to be. In order to get a unique ‘outside’ perspective, god had to create something that has an individual consciousness. To create an evolved equal for the comparison would be like creating a robot, and that robot would have the same perspective as its creator. That wouldn’t work. Instead god created a means of a self-creating universe that evolves consciousness through time. So as these consciousnesses evolve, they come closer to an answer of what god is and what they are. Since each consciousness is individual and is changing, there will never be an absolute answer.
Ultimately, there is no separation between the question and the answer. In other words, we are what we do. We must BE ourselves. We express ourselves in every action that we take. Our action is based on our individual perspective of the universe. We are living the answer to the question. God witnesses itself through our eyes, so every one of us is important, regardless of the total number. Our goal as a group should be to allow us all to explore and express our individuality to the limits of our existence.
Comments
Post a Comment